Learners acquire grammar along developmental routes that instruction can speed up but not reorder. The practical question is how to reconcile a coursebook’s grammar sequence with the learner’s internal syllabus.

Where the sources disagree

  • Emergence vs pre-selection: Thornbury lets grammar emerge and reacts. Conti pre-selects patterns and explains grammar only after processing. Both reject PPP’s “present, then produce”.
  • Readiness: Conti (via Pienemann) says you cannot quiz a learner into the next stage. Emergentists say stages are themselves frequency effects.
  • Dellar attacks PPP and tense syllabuses but concedes a place for traditional form–meaning work. Swift’s Module 1 methodology answers treat guided discovery and structural approaches as positions to explain (beliefs, roles, suitability), not to refute. In the exam, describe the debate; don’t take a side.

Notes

More notes (by source)

A Journey in TEFL

From my books (highlights)

Key terms (DELTA M1)

developmental sequence · Processability Theory · Teachability Hypothesis · interlanguage · U-shaped learning · implicit vs explicit knowledge · declarative vs procedural knowledge · proceduralisation · PPP · guided discovery · structural syllabus