How rewards, praise, grades, competition and homework affect motivation and learning. This is the evidence base for gamification and conduct systems (Tanga, Axloqiy baholash).

Where the sources disagree

  • Kohn vs the meta-analyses: Kohn says rewards undermine interest, full stop. Cameron & Pierce (1994) found small overall effects and positive effects of verbal rewards. Deci, Koestner & Ryan (1999) found expected tangible contingent rewards undermine free-choice intrinsic motivation, while unexpected rewards and positive feedback do not. Synthesis: the reward’s type, expectancy and contingency matter more than its existence. (Claude)
  • Praise: Read (descriptive praise as a management tool) vs Kohn (praise as control). Henderlong & Lepper (2002): informational, sincere, process praise can help.
  • Homework: Kohn says no benefit before high school; Cooper et al. (2006) found positive associations at secondary.
  • Grit: Kohn’s scepticism is supported by Credé et al. (2017).

Kohn

Cross-source

More notes (by source)

Adaptive Learning in ELT (Philip Kerr)

From my books (highlights)

Key terms (DELTA M1)

intrinsic vs extrinsic motivation · overjustification effect (Lepper, Greene & Nisbett 1973) · Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan: autonomy, competence, relatedness) · contingent / expected / unexpected reward · informational vs controlling feedback · self-efficacy (Bandura) · L2 Motivational Self System (Dörnyei) · cooperative vs competitive goal structures

Already in my vault

Open questions

  • Which Tanga rewards are expected and contingent on tasks children already enjoy? Those are the highest-risk ones to redesign.
  • Can conduct points be redesigned around restoration rather than deductions (Kohn’s “working with”)?