‘Collocations, and not individual words, are minimum units of meaning.’ Four small shifts: ban single words, explore more and explain less, avoid word-for-word L1 equivalence, and revisit ‘known’ words through new partners.

Four principles

  1. Ban single words. Board new words with their partners (do homework, heavy rain, investigate the murder (of)), minimum two words.
  2. Explain less, explore more. Examples and concordance lines over definitions, which prompts “What else can mild go with?”
  3. No word-for-word equivalence. Translate whole phrases, not words.
  4. Attend to “known” words. Familiar words combine into unfamiliar meanings (lose your cool, make ends meet).

Theory

“Teaching lexically” is Dellar & Walkley’s coinage. Distinguishes compositional from non-compositional collocations (make do). No research cited in the post.

Apply in my context (Claude)

  • Easy rule for all Rahimov teachers (could be a checklist item): no single word on the board without a partner. It’s observable, cheap, and changes vocabulary notebooks immediately.
  • Uzbek/Russian learners often translate word-for-word. Principle 3 targets the most common source of unnatural IELTS collocations (e.g. “make a photo” ← Russian сделать фото).

Connections

The Lexical Approach - grammaticalised lexis, read critically · Colligation and bottom-up grammar · Round-ups, gapped boardwork and reformulation